How UK EdTech Companies Win Trust and Long-Term Contracts? | Magic EdTech

We are education technology experts.

Skip to main content
Blogs - Data

How UK EdTech Companies Can Stand Out in a Crowded Market

  • Published on: October 8, 2025
  • |
  • Updated on: October 8, 2025
  • |
  • Reading Time: 5 mins
  • |
  • Views
  • |
Authored By:

Rohan Bharati

Head of ROW Sales

In the UK, decisions about education technology are made in the corridors of multi-academy trusts. School leaders face tighter budgets, significant accountability, and constant pressure to ensure every investment improves teaching and learning.

For UK EdTech companies, the challenge is clear: buyers will not wait for promises to be fulfilled. Winning contracts and establishing lasting partnerships depend on understanding how trusts operate, what school leaders value, and how to demonstrate impact immediately.

A group of people in a bright conference room working on their laptops, while having a conversation, showcasing teamwork and strategy discussions common among UK EdTech companies.

 

Speak the Language of Trusts, Not Just Technology

Winning the trust of multi-academy trusts (MATs) is the key challenge for UK EdTech companies. These organisations oversee dozens, sometimes hundreds, of schools and act as the gatekeepers of procurement. Their leaders are less impressed by flashy features than by how well a product fits school culture, teaching methods, and governance.

A common mistake is to focus more on the product rather than on education. Trusts want to know whether your software helps meet Ofsted expectations, supports safeguarding responsibilities, or reduces teacher workload. Providers who frame their value in these terms immediately stand apart.

Showing how your product reduces hidden costs, such as teacher overtime or admin hours, makes that case even stronger.

Practical Steps for Providers

  • Research the MAT before you pitch. Who makes decisions? What strategic goals are they chasing?
  • Tailor bid documents to show alignment with Ofsted frameworks and Department for Education (DfE) guidance.
  • Use language that teachers and governors recognise. For example, speak about reducing “marking workload” or “improving pupil progress tracking” rather than just “analytics dashboards.”

Platforms like Arbor and Bromcom have grown their footprint precisely by positioning themselves as partners in educational outcomes to MATs, not just as providers of software. That distinction matters in building
long-term trust.

 

Data Care Is the New Deal-Breaker

Every MAT leader has one nightmare: the reputational and financial damage caused by a data breach. The 2021 ransomware attack on the Harris Federation, which disrupted learning for 37,000 pupils, highlighted how edtech providers can either strengthen a trust’s digital resilience or put it at risk.

Buyers are becoming less tolerant of vague promises here. Data protection is now the first filter in procurement. A product with weak security credentials will not make it onto the shortlist, regardless of its features. MAT leaders also know that avoiding one major breach can save millions in recovery costs, legal fees, and reputational damage.

Practical Steps for Providers

  • Get evidence of compliance with UK GDPR and ICO guidance in plain, school-friendly language.
  • Show how your platform handles data minimisation and role-based access.
  • Be upfront about hosting and cross-border transfers. Many trusts will demand UK-based or EU-based servers.
  • Share your incident response policy and cyber insurance coverage.

The edtech providers who provide clarity here win trust. Those who dodge the details are quietly ruled out before they even reach the demo stage.

 

Make Integrations Seamless from the Start

Most schools in the UK still use older systems. Tools like Capita SIMS, Google, and Microsoft software are at the centre of how schools manage daily operations. If a product cannot connect seamlessly with these systems, it can create more work than it solves.

MAT leaders will often test this early. A product that integrates smoothly wins attention faster than one that needs workarounds.

Buyers want to know early: Does it work with our existing systems? Can we see it in action? Providers who cannot answer these questions have fewer chances to move forward in the procurement process.

Every hour saved from duplicate data entry or manual syncing is ROI that MATs can calculate immediately.

Practical Steps for Providers

  • Plan integrations with the major MIS providers, including SIMS, Arbor, and Bromcom.
  • Offer documented APIs and tested workflows for Microsoft Teams and Google Classroom.
  • Provide case examples of successful integrations in other MATs.

Edval, a timetabling tool, became popular in the UK because it worked smoothly with schools’ existing MIS systems. The lesson for providers is clear: making integration easy can make up for other weaknesses in your product.

 

Prove Impact Through Pilots That Matter

The best suppliers run pilots that deliver measurable results within a single term. When a pilot shows measurable gains, it gives leaders the numbers they need to secure board approval.

Practical Steps for Providers

  • Set clear metrics upfront, such as reducing teacher marking time or improving attendance accuracy.
  • Involve teachers and students in feedback.
  • Share results in simple reports or charts.

Century Tech has shown that pilots with hard numbers win attention. Schools respond to evidence, not promises.

 

Scale Support Like It’s Part of the Product

Technology alone does not guarantee adoption. MAT values the providers who respond reliably and understand the school calendar. Support is often the deciding factor when products look similar on paper.

Practical Steps for Providers

  • Train teams to match school cycles.
  • Provide clear service agreements and share satisfaction ratings.
  • Offer teacher-facing webinars or clinics with technical support.

Firefly Learning built trust by making support feel like part of the product, not an afterthought.

Reliable support reduces costly downtime and prevents training expenses from spiraling, both of which MATs track closely.

 

Winning in 2025 Means Proving Fit Before the Finish Line

The UK edtech market will reward edtech providers who act fast, think strategically, and focus on real school needs. Success comes from speaking the language of MATs, demonstrating strong data care, integrating smoothly, running pilots that show measurable results, and providing support that schools can rely on.

For UK EdTech companies, the lesson is clear: winning is about earning trust, not just selling features. Those who get it right become long-term partners in the everyday work of teaching and learning. For suppliers aiming to succeed in 2025-26, aligning with these principles is the difference between being shortlisted and being remembered.

 

Written By:

Rohan Bharati

Head of ROW Sales

An accomplished business executive with over 20 years of experience driving market expansion, revenue strategy, and high-impact partnerships across global education and publishing ecosystems. With a career spanning leadership roles in EdTech, learning platforms, and content services. He has led enterprise sales and business growth initiatives across India, Asia-Pacific, Europe, and the UK. Known for building agile,
high-performing teams. He brings a strategic lens to long-term client engagement, revenue operations, and
cross-market positioning. Rohan has consistently delivered scalable growth by aligning customer needs with innovative, future-ready solutions.

FAQs

Lead with school outcomes, not features. Show how you reduce teacher workload, support safeguarding, meet Ofsted expectations, and cut hidden admin time. Map your claims to trust priorities and use language that school leaders recognise (e.g., “marking workload” and “pupil progress tracking”) with clear before/after examples.

Provide plain‑English evidence of UK GDPR compliance: DPIA summaries, data‑minimisation practices, role‑based access, audit logs, and hosting locations (UK/EU). Include your incident‑response plan, retention schedules, and a clear privacy notice so trusts can see risks are understood and controlled.

Arrive with documented APIs and tested workflows for major school stacks (MIS, identity/SSO, classroom suites). Demonstrate live data flow (rosters, grades, attendance) and show how you avoid duplicate entry. Share integration runbooks and support boundaries so IT teams know what to expect.

Keep it one term with pre‑agreed metrics (e.g., minutes of teacher time saved per week, attendance data accuracy, reduction in manual tasks). Baseline first, involve a small cohort of teachers, provide light training, and deliver a simple results report that a board can read in five minutes.

Align service hours and SLAs to the school calendar, provide named contacts, and offer teacher‑facing clinics at key times (start of term, exam windows). Share uptime/incident reports, a clear escalation path, and termly reviews tied to adoption and impact, not just tickets closed.

Get In Touch

Reach out to our team with your question and our representatives will get back to you within 24 working hours.