Who Should Lead Educational Publishing Evolution: In-House Teams
or External Experts?
- Published on: January 14, 2025
- |
- Updated on: January 15, 2025
- |
- Reading Time: 4 mins
- |
-
- |
In the early 2000s, educational publishing houses stood as towering gatekeepers of knowledge. Their meticulously crafted textbooks and resources were the gold standard in classrooms worldwide. Large teams of editors, subject matter experts, and instructional designers poured over every detail to ensure the text was accurate and aligned with academic standards. It was a thriving, structured industry where prestige was built on the depth of content and the weight of the publisher’s name.
Then, like in many other industries, AI got in the way. The market for publishing became stagnant.
Now, technology companies envision a future where teachers craft lesson plans and interactive tutorials using AI-powered tools, bypassing the need for traditional publishers altogether. The once-ironclad dominance of publishing houses is giving way to a more fluid and commoditized approach to educational content creation.
As AI models churn out content at an unprecedented pace, publishers face mounting pressure to prove their value. Like any industry under siege, the expectation is clear — adapt or risk irrelevance. Smaller entities leveraging AI are flooding the market with low-cost, passable materials, eroding the competitiveness that once set major publishers apart.
And with abundance comes price erosion. As educational content becomes easier and cheaper to produce, customers grow increasingly skeptical of premium-priced resources. Margins shrink, and the value of professionally developed materials diminishes.
Now as publishers prepare for a future where content creation is increasingly intertwined with AI, they find themselves revisiting the familiar debate of whether to cultivate talent in-house or outsource expertise.
A Precarious Tightrope: In-House Teams and Outsourcing
The promise of AI in education comes with its own set of demands.
AI might unlock new possibilities for content development, but ensuring the accuracy, inclusivity, and fairness of AI-generated materials requires specialized oversight. In-house teams often lack the bandwidth or expertise, and even traditional outsourcing vendors may not be fully prepared to navigate the intricacies of AI vetting.
As markets expand globally, publishers are grappling with the need to localize content for diverse regions, languages, and educational standards. This growing demand for international alignment stretches internal teams thin, forcing them to rethink how content is developed and scaled.
Adding to the complexity, the post-COVID shift toward remote and hybrid work has blurred the lines between in-house and outsourced operations. Traditional content production models are being reimagined as publishers tap into distributed teams. The boundaries are shifting, and those who fail to embrace this networked approach, risk being left behind.
Shift in User Expectations
In the past content was only about accuracy but today’s content should also be engaging and dynamic. Educators and institutions are demanding content that adapts to individual learner needs. AI-powered, personalized experiences are becoming more of a standard.
Agile competitors are quick to embrace immersive and interactive learning experiences. They are remaking education publishing. And that project of remaking education, in everyone’s image, for decades has been about personalization, which makes them perfectly poised to capture the market.
The Best Deal in Educational Publishing
It’s no longer enough to simply produce high-quality content. The pressure to deliver timely, compliant, and updated content is more intense than ever. As publishers transition from publishing textbooks to becoming digital providers of education and training services, they need to adapt to the demands of speed, innovation, and personalization and that requires a strategic approach.
By combining the speed of outsourcing with the strategic innovation of in-house teams, publishers can build a flexible, efficient, and innovative content creation model. Many academic publishers are partnering with tech companies to augment their intelligence and capabilities.
The outsourced class is often composed of agile, specialized professionals with expertise in technology-driven learning solutions. They specialize in fields such as accessibility audits, interactive, gamified experiences, and immersive content creation. This makes the content more accessible and appealing to a global audience.
At the same time, for projects that require deep knowledge of your brand’s vision and long-term strategy, in-house teams are essential. These strategic initiatives demand a nuanced understanding of educational pedagogy and your company’s goals. Such innovation needs to reflect your organization’s unique approach to modern learning.
This synergy between in-house teams and expert vendors also drives innovation. It introduces advanced tools like adaptive learning algorithms and AI-powered solutions that modernize traditional publishing approaches. By integrating vendor platforms, publishers can deliver more engaging and personalized learning experiences tailored to diverse learner needs. For example, by collaborating with Duolingo, Pearson is tapping into Duolingo’s strengths in gamified, accessible, and engaging language learning experiences. And their combined strengths are creating a more comprehensive and learner-friendly approach to language education.
The Alarm Bells Should Be Going Off…now!
We have reached so far from the idea of traditional publishing. Yet professionals simply view vendors as task executioners. There is a need to shift the perspective from viewing vendors as external resources to seeing them as integral success partners. Hybrid models are a priority that impacts the business.
Professionals need to get the various leaders on board by making sure they understand that this is not just another resource. Start with a value discussion, a business discussion, and a discussion about learner impact, and how this will affect the customers and revenue. By aligning on shared KPIs around quality, compliance, and innovation, and making sure vendors understand the role, edtech publishers can build a partnership that contributes to long-term vision.
Want to create a long-term learning impact? Then, contact Magic EdTech for further assistance.
FAQs
The optimal ratio typically depends on content complexity and subject matter. For foundational subjects like basic math or vocabulary, AI can handle up to 70% of initial content generation with human experts focusing on verification and enhancement. For advanced or nuanced topics like literature analysis or scientific concepts, reverse this ratio to ensure accuracy and depth. Start with small pilot projects to establish your ideal balance.
Focus on hiring instructional designers with data analysis capabilities and experience in adaptive learning systems. They should understand both pedagogical principles and AI limitations. Project managers with experience in agile methodologies and digital transformation are crucial, as they'll coordinate between AI tools, external experts, and internal stakeholders.
Beyond standard NDAs, implement a tiered access system where vendors work with masked or sandboxed versions of your AI models. Establish clear ownership guidelines for derivative works and improvements made to AI systems. Create detailed audit trails of content creation and modification. Consider developing proprietary middleware that vendors must use to interact with your systems.
Monitor content development speed (time to market), learner engagement rates, and learning outcome improvements. Track the number of content revisions required before final approval, cost per learning unit produced, and user feedback scores. Compare these metrics across different content creation approaches to optimize your model.
Get In Touch
Reach out to our team with your question and our representatives will get back to you within 24 working hours.