We are education technology experts.

Skip to main content

Episode 51

The Implications of GenAI on Data: A Conversation with 1EdTech

Brief description of the episode

In this episode, Beatriz Arnillas, Vice President of Product Management at 1EdTech, and Parag Samarth, Chief Strategy Officer at Magic EdTech, discuss the TrustEd Apps initiative by 1EdTech. They discuss the program’s evolution from focusing on data privacy to encompassing security, accessibility, and a new GenAI data rubric. Beatriz explains the importance of transparency, organizational preparedness, and data literacy in using AI in education. The conversation highlights the need for critical thinking and responsible data use to create safer and more effective educational technology environments. She also encourages educators and edtech providers to work together towards a safer, more mature, and reliable industry.


Key Takeaways:

  • GenAI provides tools that can generate content, analyze data, and offer insights. Students utilizing these tools need to understand how AI works, including data collection, processing, and interpretation.
  • Educators must teach students how to critically assess the validity, reliability, and bias in AI-generated content. This involves understanding where the data comes from, how it’s used, and the potential implications of relying on AI-generated information.
  • GenAI tools might use student data to generate content, raising concerns about student data privacy and ownership.
  • With the widespread use of GenAI in education, critical thinking becomes paramount. Students need to evaluate the quality of AI-generated content, question assumptions, and identify potential biases.
  • Educators can design activities that challenge students to compare AI-generated content from different sources, analyze discrepancies, and verify information through independent research.
  • GenAI prompts educators to reconsider their teaching methods, encouraging them to foster a culture of inquiry, skepticism, and evidence-based reasoning.
  • The rubric prompts developers to clearly state if their educational technology product uses Generative AI. This informs educators about the potential presence of AI-generated content and the data implications.
  • The rubric asks developers to explain how user data is used to improve the GenAI model. This transparency allows educators to understand how student data might be leveraged and for what purposes.
  • By highlighting the importance of data source transparency in the rubric, the initiative indirectly addresses privacy concerns. Educators are prompted to consider where the data used to train the GenAI model originates. This can help students understand the potential biases or limitations of the AI-generated content.
  • The rubric encourages developers to provide user opt-in/out options, particularly for student data. This empowers educators and potentially students (depending on age) with some control over how their data is used in the context of GenAI.
  • While not directly regulating ownership, the rubric includes questions about data ownership. This prompts developers to consider this aspect and potentially develop clearer ownership policies related to data used in their GenAI models.
  • Educators and potentially students can be encouraged to be aware of where the data used to train GenAI models originates. This can help identify potential biases present in the source data that might be reflected in the AI’s outputs.
  • Having diverse teams involved in developing educational technology, including GenAI tools, is a well-established strategy for mitigating bias. Diverse perspectives can help identify potential biases in the development process.
  • The GenAI rubric’s focus on transparency can indirectly help mitigate bias. By understanding how user data is used and having some control over it (through opt-in/out options), educators can be more selective about the educational technology they use and potentially choose tools that prioritize responsible data practices.
  • Encouraging students to evaluate information from AI sources critically can help mitigate the impact of potential bias in the outputs.

Stay informed.

Subscribe to receive the latest episode in your inbox.